Asus H170I-PLUS D3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics24.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive243% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H170I-PLUS D3  (all builds)
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180222
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateJan 12 '21 at 16:34
Run Duration250 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$79
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Memory 80.5
1-Core 79.4
2-Core 200
68% 120 Pts
4-Core 386
8-Core 397
52% 392 Pts
64-Core 379
23% 379 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
Asus(1043 8553) 2GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
24.5% Poor
Lighting 30.1
Reflection 35.7
Parallax 28.7
24% 31.5 fps
MRender 34.6
Gravity 29.7
Splatting 26.7
24% 30.3 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
324GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 907 822 814 806 806 791 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
243% Outstanding
Read 1,565
Write 1,459
Mixed 1,292
SusWrite 824
288% 1,285 MB/s
4K Read 60.1
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 80.9
266% 91.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,186
DQ Write 950
DQ Mixed 1,068
800% 1,068 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 243%
Great: 346%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
197GB free
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 355 401 406 398 405 373 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 432
Write 421
Mixed 372
SusWrite 389
91% 403 MB/s
4K Read 44.2
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 60
201% 70.4 MB/s
DQ Read 362
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 333
252% 338 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 119%
Great: 134%
Crucial MX200 500GB-$90
184GB free
Firmware: MU05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 348 396 401 375 377 346 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Read 380
Write 409
Mixed 301
SusWrite 374
82% 366 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 39.4
149% 57.1 MB/s
DQ Read 258
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 160
156% 244 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 105%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 1TB
264GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 369 370 371 369 371 338 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
69.7% Good
Read 372
Write 371
Mixed 350
SusWrite 365
82% 364 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 20.3
4K Mixed 27.5
78% 23.1 MB/s
DQ Read 170
DQ Write 171
DQ Mixed 171
128% 171 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 99%
Digital Camera Storage 8GB
7GB free, PID 8611
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.2 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
3.51% Terrible
Read 7.5
Write 2.7
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 3.2
5% 4.47 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.8
49% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.51%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT102464BD186D.M16 CT102464BD160B.C16 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
58.9% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 18.7
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 18
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 79.5
50% 79.5 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H170I-PLUS D3 Builds (Compare 73 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H170I-PLUS D3 - $325

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $449
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback