HP 110-210

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 18%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP 110-210  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2B18
Memory0.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20131108
Uptime16 Days
Run DateOct 13 '21 at 15:37
Run Duration241 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-5000 APU
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
19.4% Very poor
Memory 28.9
1-Core 21.8
2-Core 37.8
19% 29.5 Pts
4-Core 57.5
8-Core 62.3
8% 59.9 Pts
64-Core 76.8
5% 76.8 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 33%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8330
HP(103C 2B18) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.301.1001.1001
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
1.55% Terrible
Lighting 1.6
Reflection 3.3
Parallax 2.4
1% 2.43 fps
MRender 2.2
Gravity 2
Splatting 3
2% 2.4 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.55%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 62 64 63 60 60 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
21.2% Poor
Read 13
Write 29.3
Mixed 25.8
SusWrite 61
24% 32.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.2
30% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 69%
Digital Camera Storage 8GB
4GB free, PID 8611
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.3 4 4 4 4 4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
2.64% Terrible
Read 6.3
Write 4
Mixed 5
SusWrite 3.9
6% 4.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.6
31% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.64%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
13.7% Very poor
MC Read 5.5
MC Write 3.8
MC Mixed 5.1
14% 4.8 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 2.8
SC Mixed 4.3
10% 3.57 GB/s
Latency 261
15% 261 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 110-210 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 110-210

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 16% - Very poor Total price: $89
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback