Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx

Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	23.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	75.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 838F
Memory	5.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190418
Uptime	1.8 Days
Run Date	Jan 16 '21 at 21:04
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	22%

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	58.1% Above average	Memory 69.1 1-Core 101 2-Core 182 67% 117 Pts	4-Core 256 8-Core 378 39% 317 Pts	64-Core 464 29% 464 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 58.1% Great: 73%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel HD Graphics 630 310,249 User benchmarks, average bench 5% HP(103C 838F) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681 Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	3.44% Terrible	Lighting 6.4 Reflection 6.3 Parallax 7.5 5% 6.73 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.44% Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile) 160,694 User benchmarks, average bench 23% HP(103C 838F) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 452.41 Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	23.9% Poor	Lighting 30 Reflection 28.9 Parallax 30.2 24% 29.7 fps	MRender 34.3 Gravity 33.4 Splatting 20 23% 29.2 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 23.9% Great: 25%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteon CA1-8D256-HP 256GB 1,040 User benchmarks, average bench 129% 17GB free (System drive) Firmware: A182 SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 184 137 95 64 38 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	75.1% Very good	Read 704 Write 88 Mixed 194 SusWrite 102 59% 272 MB/s	4K Read 22 4K Write 33.4 4K Mixed 20 77% 25.1 MB/s	DQ Read 724 DQ Write 57.5 DQ Mixed 76.6 135% 286 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 75.1% Great: 170%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB 145,911 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 75GB free Firmware: RXM3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 83 76 76 86 88 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	37.9% Below average	Read 49.6 Write 54.8 Mixed 43 SusWrite 82 42% 57.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.2 78% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 37.9% Great: 95%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HP26D4S9S8MH-8 2x8GB 2,916 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	63.6% Good	MC Read 26.3 MC Write 26.8 MC Mixed 20.2 70% 24.4 GB/s	SC Read 9.5 SC Write 14.3 SC Mixed 12.3 34% 12 GB/s	Latency 104 39% 104 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 63.6% Great: 81%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx Builds (Compare 3,485 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	2,478x
Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples	1,006x
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 72%, 1 sample	1x

GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	1,412x
GTX 1060 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 43%, 36,643 samples	824x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	808x

SSD
MZVLW128HEGR-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 176%, 8,655 samples	310x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	284x
CA1-8D128-HP 128GBLiteonBench 117%, 4,097 samples	165x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	361x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples	321x
HP26D4S9S8MH-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 70%, 2,916 samples	197x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210	Nvidia RTX 4060 $285	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320