Asus B85M-G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive22.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus B85M-G  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140811
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 22 '21 at 14:19
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Memory 86
1-Core 96
2-Core 189
72% 124 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 342
47% 350 Pts
64-Core 349
22% 349 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Nvidia(10DE 11C7) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Lighting 18.4
Reflection 18.8
Parallax 18.7
15% 18.6 fps
MRender 16.1
Gravity 19.5
Splatting 17.3
14% 17.6 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400S37/240GB 240GB
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0918A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.1 79 98 2.6 6.7 26 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
22.6% Poor
Read 237
Write 194
Mixed 19.5
SusWrite 36.7
27% 122 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 11.5
4K Mixed 0.4
33% 9.87 MB/s
DQ Read 71.4
DQ Write 16.9
DQ Mixed 0.4
12% 29.6 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 22.6%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
870GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 180 182 174 187 182 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 191
Write 158
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 182
112% 153 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 107%
Great: 113%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
287GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 123 122 113 128 122 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
73.1% Very good
Read 133
Write 102
Mixed 29
SusWrite 122
70% 96.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 103%
General UDisk 2TB
2TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 14 15 15 15 15 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
35.1% Below average
Read 9.7
Write 14.2
Mixed 11.5
SusWrite 14.6
18% 12.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 9.9
4K Mixed 0.5
355% 3.57 MB/s
DQ Read 0.3
DQ Write 10.6
DQ Mixed 0.5
379% 3.8 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-559.A00LF 16GB
1333, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.7% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 8.1
26% 8.93 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 9.5
26% 9.17 GB/s
Latency 71.3
56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B85M-G Builds (Compare 5,973 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus B85M-G - $80

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $317
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback