Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 15% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	28% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-7100-$40 79,299 User benchmarks, average bench 57% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	56% Above average	Memory 78.8 1-Core 81.7 2-Core 117 58% 92.5 Pts	4-Core 194 8-Core 195 26% 195 Pts	64-Core 217 13% 217 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 8603) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.30 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	28% Poor	Lighting 35.7 Reflection 39.9 Parallax 34.2 29% 36.6 fps	MRender 34.6 Gravity 38.3 Splatting 24.4 26% 32.4 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 28% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Ccboot iSCSI 1TB 138 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 120GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 6.3 5.6 6.7 6.5 6.9 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 13% Great: 103%
Ccboot iSCSI 960GB 43 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 441GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 7 6.3 5.6 6.8 6.5 7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	6.63% Terrible	Read 16.3 Write 6.7 Mixed 13 SusWrite 6.5 8% 10.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.3 58% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 6.63% Great: 37%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Mushkin 99[2/7/4]199[F/T] 1x8GB 125 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	21.7% Poor	MC Read 7.6 MC Write 7.4 MC Mixed 6.3 20% 7.1 GB/s	SC Read 4.3 SC Write 4.7 SC Mixed 4.3 13% 4.43 GB/s	Latency 82.7 48% 82.7 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 21.7% Great: 43%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	177x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	172x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	111x

RAM
CL16-16-16 D4-2400 2x16GBGEILBench 73%, 565 samples	57x
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBG.SKILL $31Bench 71%, 98,777 samples	34x
CL16-16-16 D4-2400 2x8GBGEILBench 69%, 4,039 samples	27x

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $157