Today's hottest deals

Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics32.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock 970 Pro3 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160531
Uptime9 Days
Run DateFeb 04 '21 at 12:23
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$95
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
71.4% Very good
Memory 93
1-Core 74.9
2-Core 146
64% 105 Pts
4-Core 271
8-Core 448
44% 359 Pts
64-Core 440
27% 440 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M4000
HP(103C 1153) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.19
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32.4% Below average
Lighting 38.5
Reflection 41.7
Parallax 37.1
31% 39.1 fps
MRender 50.9
Gravity 37.5
Splatting 39.1
34% 42.5 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$77
119GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 350 246 290 280 261 264 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Read 409
Write 389
Mixed 348
SusWrite 282
80% 357 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 59.4
4K Mixed 40.8
133% 44.2 MB/s
DQ Read 37.4
DQ Write 85.2
DQ Mixed 51.3
42% 58 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 129%
Seagate ST2000DM005-2CW102 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 126 145 151 146 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Read 115
Write 148
Mixed 67.8
SusWrite 144
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
80% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 88%
Intenso High Speed Line 64GB
31GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 38 38 38 40 42 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
Read 243
Write 48.5
Mixed 46.3
SusWrite 39.4
94% 94.3 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 16.4
4K Mixed 10.9
979% 13.6 MB/s
DQ Read 18.5
DQ Write 10.3
DQ Mixed 12.4
841% 13.7 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F641GU67F9333G 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.4% Average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 17.4
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 14
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 62.2
64% 62.2 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Pro3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 799 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0 - $18

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $192
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback