Today's hottest deals

Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive125% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA  (all builds)
Memory27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170607
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '21 at 19:35
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$85
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
62.4% Good
Memory 79.5
1-Core 71.4
2-Core 132
58% 94.5 Pts
4-Core 246
8-Core 416
40% 331 Pts
64-Core 362
22% 362 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
Asus(1043 8408) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 300 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2.2% Terrible
Lighting 2.9
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 0.9
2% 2.07 fps
MRender 2.6
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 2
2% 2.33 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.2%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor M8Pe NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$110
146GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.06 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 580 597 580 550 539 524 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 930
Write 753
Mixed 511
SusWrite 562
154% 689 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 60.2
4K Mixed 30
118% 40.5 MB/s
DQ Read 486
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 401
300% 404 MB/s
Poor: 125%
This bench: 125%
Great: 215%
WD WD4005FZBX-00K5WB0 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 207 201 214 199 201 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 182
Mixed 86.2
SusWrite 204
120% 165 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 1.7
346% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 112%
Great: 136%
Seagate Video SV35.6 Series 3TB-$79
2TB free
Firmware: CV27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 186 182 191 189 192 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 189
Write 154
Mixed 35.5
SusWrite 187
102% 141 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 108%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. Kingston 99U5471-054.A00LF Kingston 99U5471-054.A00LF 32GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
38.8% Below average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 12.7
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 12
28% 9.93 GB/s
Latency 81.5
49% 81.5 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 PRO GAMING/AURA Builds (Compare 921 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA - $299

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $543
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback