IBM System x3200 -[4363K1G]-

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive14.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemIBM System x3200 -[4363K1G]-  (all builds)
MotherboardIBM M31IX
Memory3.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20070810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 18 '17 at 20:19
Run Duration227 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 90%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon 3040
LGA775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.85 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
37.8% Below average
Memory 69.9
1-Core 19.9
2-Core 33.7
32% 41.2 Pts
4-Core 37.5
8-Core 36.9
5% 37.2 Pts
64-Core 35.5
2% 35.5 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SV100S264G 64GB
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 120504 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Read 217
Write 70.4
Mixed 113
29% 134 MB/s
4K Read 2.01
4K Write 1.55
4K Mixed 0.18
4% 1.25 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 30%
Lsilogic Logical Volume 299GB
75GB free
Firmware: 3000
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 35% Great: 94%
Lsilogic Logical Volume 159GB
51GB free
Firmware: 3000
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 95.5
Write 49.6
Mixed 64.8
52% 70 MB/s
4K Read 0.26
4K Write 1.18
4K Mixed 0.25
61% 0.56 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 42%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 248GB
40GB free
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
58.5% Above average
Read 98.2
Write 105
Mixed 106
78% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.28
4K Write 1.95
4K Mixed 0.51
105% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 58%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
23GB free
Firmware: 1AA01118 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Read 107
Write 96.2
Mixed 90.7
74% 97.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 2.03
4K Mixed 0.37
107% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
null MHz
1024, 2048, 1024, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
14.7% Very poor
MC Read 5.2
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 4.1
13% 4.4 GB/s
SC Read 3.9
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 3.8
11% 3.77 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback