Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-Q2556N v2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.79% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive53.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Q2556N v2  (all builds)
Memory9.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140512
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 21 '17 at 11:13
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4710MQ-$36
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
63% Good
Memory 81.1
1-Core 65
2-Core 148
59% 98.2 Pts
4-Core 244
8-Core 387
39% 316 Pts
64-Core 386
24% 386 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 63%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 840M
Clevo(1558 6502) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 22.21.13.8253
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
9.79% Terrible
Lighting 13.4
Reflection 9.88
Parallax 10.6
11% 11.3 fps
MRender 6.33
Gravity 13.3
Splatting 8.52
8% 9.37 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.79%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Mushkin MKNSSDAT240GB 240GB
213GB free
Firmware: 507ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
48.2% Average
Read 495
Write 154
Mixed 228
64% 292 MB/s
4K Read 11.5
4K Write 24.6
4K Mixed 9.27
42% 15.1 MB/s
DQ Read 136
DQ Write 149
DQ Mixed 7.94
43% 97.5 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 71%
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$30
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32080RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Read 485
Write 374
Mixed 437
96% 432 MB/s
4K Read 11.9
4K Write 23.9
4K Mixed 4.28
36% 13.4 MB/s
DQ Read 15.6
DQ Write 32
DQ Mixed 6.08
10% 17.9 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend TS1GSK64W6H Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 12GB
1600, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
48.4% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 15.1
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 15.6
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 78.6
51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Q2556N v2 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Q2556N v2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $36
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback