MSI 870A-G54 (MS-7599)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7599
MotherboardMSI 870A-G54 (MS-7599)  (all builds)
Memory8.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.4 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100909
Uptime2.6 Days
Run DateJun 22 '17 at 08:07
Run Duration377 Seconds
Run User CYP-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
60.5% Good
Memory 84.1
1-Core 53.6
2-Core 108
52% 81.9 Pts
4-Core 215
8-Core 215
29% 215 Pts
64-Core 214
13% 214 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 5770
Sapphire(174B 1482) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Lighting 15.4
Reflection 11.2
Parallax 13.2
12% 13.2 fps
MRender 10.7
Gravity 11.5
Splatting 12.9
10% 11.7 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate M3 1TB
463GB free
Firmware: 0707
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 15% Great: 64%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
206GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
48% Average
Read 93.1
Write 74.3
Mixed 62.9
57% 76.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 1.36
4K Mixed 0.17
60% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 48%
Great: 59%
Samsung M2 Portable 3 1TB
266GB free, PID 60c6
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
30.1% Below average
Read 71.6
Write 72.6
Mixed 55.8
85% 66.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.22
4K Mixed 0.33
54% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 39%
ST1000LM 024 HN-M101MBB 1TB
124GB free, PID 1065
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
23.1% Poor
Read 57.8
Write 58.9
Mixed 38.4
65% 51.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 0.56
4K Mixed 0.33
32% 0.45 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 23.1%
Great: 47%
ST950032 5AS 500GB
120GB free, PID 102a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Read 29.2
Write 29.1
Mixed 26.2
36% 28.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 0.92
4K Mixed 0.3
43% 0.56 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 19%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB
118GB free, PID 1023
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Read 19.7
Write 18.8
Mixed 7.23
18% 15.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.89
4K Mixed 0.37
79% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 20%
StoreJet Transcend 320GB
117GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Read 19.6
Write 19
Mixed 5.11
17% 14.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 0.98
4K Mixed 0.28
44% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM3X2G1333C9 CM3X2G1333C9 Kingston HP698650-154-HYAG Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB 12GB
1440, 1440, 1440, 1440 MHz
2048, 2048, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34% Below average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 8.1
MC Mixed 12.4
33% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 8.5
21% 7.37 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 34%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 870A-G54 (MS-7599) Builds (Compare 57 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI 870A-G54 (MS-7599)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $168
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback