ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP Z620 Workstation

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 55% Gunboat	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	8.09% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	80.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP Z620 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 158A
Memory	91.3 GB free of 96 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191029
Uptime	6.8 Days
Run Date	Mar 15 '21 at 10:08
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2667 0 674 User benchmarks, average bench 68% CPU0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	54.7% Above average	Memory 51.9 1-Core 75.9 2-Core 168 54% 98.7 Pts	4-Core 308 8-Core 480 49% 394 Pts	64-Core 1,288 80% 1,288 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 54.7% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 250 25,802 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Dell(1028 2120) 2GB CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.11.2 Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	8.09% Terrible	Lighting 10.5 Reflection 12.8 Parallax 13.8 9% 12.4 fps	MRender 8.6 Gravity 9.4 Splatting 8.4 7% 8.8 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 8.09% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Netapp X438_1625400MCSG 400GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 286GB free (System drive) Firmware: NA03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 382 390 392 399 412 396 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	80.5% Excellent	Read 359 Write 299 Mixed 301 SusWrite 395 76% 338 MB/s	4K Read 18.9 4K Write 53.1 4K Mixed 24.9 89% 32.3 MB/s	DQ Read 389 DQ Write 270 DQ Mixed 209 189% 289 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 80.5% Great: 92%
Hitachi DKR2D-H3R0SS 3TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 3TB free Firmware: FEFE SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 44 44 44 43 44 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	54% Above average	Read 145 Write 42.8 Mixed 57.2 SusWrite 43.5 53% 72.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.7 124% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 54% Great: 87%
Hitachi HUS723030ALS640 3TB 51 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 3TB free Firmware: A222 SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 131 132 135 134 137 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	90.7% Outstanding	Read 183 Write 158 Mixed 78.8 SusWrite 133 101% 138 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.9 182% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 90.7% Great: 96%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1K70CH0-CH9 M393B1K70CH0-CH9 M393B1K70CH0-CH9 M393B1K70CH0-CH9 M393B1K70CH0-CH9 M393B1K70CH0-CH9 M393B1K70CH0-CH9 M393B1K70CH0-CH9 M393B1K70CH0-CH9 M393B... 96GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	78.2% Very good	MC Read 35.3 MC Write 32 MC Mixed 29.9 93% 32.4 GB/s	SC Read 12.3 SC Write 3.5 SC Mixed 4.9 20% 6.9 GB/s	Latency 154 26% 154 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical Z620 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,438 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 17%

Surfboard

Desktop

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

System: HP Z620 Workstation

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 01stBench 55%, 2,873 samples	154x
Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples	152x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	131x

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	174x
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	113x
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	96x

SSD
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	72x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	68x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	61x

RAM
9965525-138.A00LF 12x8GBKingstonBench 111%, 25 samples	24x
18JDF1G72PZ-1G6E1 8x8GBMicronBench 98%, 24 samples	21x
M393B1K70DH0-CK0 4x8GBSamsungBench 83%, 405 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback