ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 1095AR1

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	20.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Lenovo 1095AR1 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO LENOVO
Memory	27.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170327
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 29 '21 at 12:52
Run Duration	163 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2658 0 52 User benchmarks, average bench 54% CPU 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	55% Above average	Memory 68.7 1-Core 53.8 2-Core 118 48% 80.2 Pts	4-Core 223 8-Core 436 39% 330 Pts	64-Core 1,062 66% 1,062 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 55% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 570-$350 22,303 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Asus(1043 8387) 1.2GB CLim: 742 MHz, MLim: 950 MHz, Ram: 1.2GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	20.3% Poor	Lighting 23.6 Reflection 38.6 Parallax 28.2 19% 30.1 fps	MRender 37.7 Gravity 21 Splatting 24.7 22% 27.8 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 20.3% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM830 mSATA 64GB 296 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 6GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3D1Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 232 Write 134 Mixed 126 36% 164 MB/s	4K Read 16.3 4K Write 31.4 4K Mixed 16.2 62% 21.3 MB/s	DQ Read 174 DQ Write 50.6 DQ Mixed 71.1 63% 98.5 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 62%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 192GB free Firmware: 3B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 238 239 238 237 238 238 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	66.3% Good	Read 245 Write 236 Mixed 235 SusWrite 238 54% 239 MB/s	4K Read 28.6 4K Write 41.4 4K Mixed 32.4 107% 34.1 MB/s	DQ Read 200 DQ Write 189 DQ Mixed 194 146% 194 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 66.3% Great: 128%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 200GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 186GB free Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.2 8.1 8 7.7 7.6 8.4 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	38.9% Below average	Read 128 Write 25.6 Mixed 34.9 SusWrite 8 36% 49 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.7 132% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 38.9% Great: 48%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 4TB 498 User benchmarks, average bench 154% 3.5TB free Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.7 8.8 8.7 9 8.9 9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	73.3% Very good	Read 247 Write 26.8 Mixed 29.7 SusWrite 8.8 57% 78.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.8 138% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 73.3% Great: 223%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B5273CH0- M393B5270CH0- M393B5170FH0- M393B5270CH0- M393B5270CH0- M393B5270CH0- M393B5270CH0- M393B5270CH0- 32GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	75.9% Very good	MC Read 35.1 MC Write 28.3 MC Mixed 29.3 88% 30.9 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 5.8 21% 7.27 GB/s	Latency 105 38% 105 ns
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 75.9% Great: 76%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback