Today's hottest deals

Daktech Gemini 67

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics24.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemDaktech Gemini 67  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel DQ67SW
Memory9.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140313
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 29 '21 at 18:00
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
SKTH, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Memory 91.9
1-Core 95.2
2-Core 184
73% 124 Pts
4-Core 355
8-Core 340
47% 347 Pts
64-Core 359
22% 359 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
24.7% Poor
Lighting 30.3
Reflection 33.2
Parallax 31.7
25% 31.7 fps
MRender 37.5
Gravity 33
Splatting 22.9
25% 31.1 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24.7%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7SB3Q128G1001 128GB
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X2230001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 194 172 164 147 124 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
69% Good
Read 417
Write 245
Mixed 204
SusWrite 170
58% 259 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 48.5
4K Mixed 29.8
105% 35.1 MB/s
DQ Read 215
DQ Write 211
DQ Mixed 116
114% 181 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 69%
Great: 93%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$19
10GB free
Firmware: KC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 107 113 117 79 91 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 104
Write 100
Mixed 59.6
SusWrite 101
67% 91.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
128% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 88%
Maxtor OneTouch II 300GB
57GB free, PID 7110
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 25 25 25 25 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
23.6% Poor
Read 27.1
Write 23.8
Mixed 22
SusWrite 24.7
33% 24.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.2
166% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 23.6%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BA160B.C16F Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 CT51264BA160B.C16F Samsung M378B5673EH1-CH9 12GB
1600, 1333, 1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
52.2% Above average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 16.3
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 16.6
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 64.3
62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Gemini 67 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Daktech Gemini 67

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $158
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback