PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 24.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 65% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Daktech Gemini 67 (all builds) |
Motherboard | Intel DQ67SW |
Memory | 8.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20140313 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Mar 30 '21 at 17:25 |
Run Duration | 149 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 68% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500
SKTH, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
57.7%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.92
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
24.6%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sandisk SD7SB3Q128G1001 128GB
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X2230001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 105 128 127 124 122 MB/s
|
65%
Good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$19
11GB free
Firmware: KC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 103 113 121 115 90 MB/s
|
58.3%
Above average
|
|||
Maxtor OneTouch II 300GB
57GB free, PID 7110
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 23 24 25 25 25 MB/s
|
23.4%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-2600Intel $158Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 3x |
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 2x |
Core i7-2700KIntel $89Bench 73%, 20,692 samples | 1x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 3x |
Quadro K600NvidiaBench 3%, 8,087 samples | 1x |
GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples | 1x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 78% - Very good | Total price: $158 |