Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive34.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory28GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 28GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory25.3 GB free of 28 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180518
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 08 '21 at 17:05
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Silver 4114
None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
46.2% Average
Memory 59.4
1-Core 67.1
2-Core 104
47% 76.8 Pts
4-Core 194
8-Core 182
25% 188 Pts
64-Core 185
11% 185 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 63%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Virtual HD 136GB
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 261 250 249 250 249 249 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
34.7% Below average
Read 254
Write 370
Mixed 280
SusWrite 251
65% 289 MB/s
4K Read 7.9
4K Write 8.8
4K Mixed 9
28% 8.57 MB/s
DQ Read 7.9
DQ Write 8.8
DQ Mixed 8.8
6% 8.5 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 78%
Virtual HD 189GB
172GB free
Firmware: 1.1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 331 364 344 341 351 329 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 22% Great: 42%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 429GB
273GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 315 288 287 287 288 288 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
40.2% Average
Read 292
Write 427
Mixed 330
SusWrite 292
76% 335 MB/s
4K Read 9
4K Write 10.1
4K Mixed 10.5
32% 9.87 MB/s
DQ Read 9.1
DQ Write 10.4
DQ Mixed 10.3
8% 9.93 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 28GB
null MHz
1024, 27648 MB
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
27.8% Poor
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 10.8
MC Mixed 9.2
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 5.2
15% 5.1 GB/s
Latency 129
31% 129 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 137%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,995 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback