Zotac XXXXXX

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 21% Surfboard	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	61.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Zotac XXXXXX (all builds)
Motherboard	ZOTAC XXXXXX
Memory	2.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151230
Uptime	2.4 Days
Run Date	Apr 12 '21 at 00:00
Run Duration	290 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	47%

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3150 3,131 User benchmarks, average bench 26% ¯¯¯¯¯¯SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	19.5% Very poor	Memory 28.7 1-Core 17.6 2-Core 29.9 17% 25.4 Pts	4-Core 58.9 8-Core 67.9 8% 63.4 Pts	64-Core 70 4% 70 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 19.5% Great: 32%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 60,712 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Zotac(19DA B273) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	1.59% Terrible	Lighting 1.7 Reflection 1.5 Parallax 2.6 1% 1.93 fps	MRender 2.7 Gravity 1.8 Splatting 2.7 2% 2.4 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.59% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX100 500GB-$49 13,478 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 149GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 308 309 331 229 328 253 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	61.1% Good	Read 416 Write 363 Mixed 13.2 SusWrite 293 60% 271 MB/s	4K Read 16 4K Write 28.1 4K Mixed 21.4 66% 21.8 MB/s	DQ Read 137 DQ Write 116 DQ Mixed 121 92% 125 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 61.1% Great: 108%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 6TB 10,357 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 380GB free Firmware: D781 SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.9 9 8.8 8.8 9 8.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	12.6% Very poor	Read 33.8 Write 36.8 Mixed 28.7 SusWrite 8.9 20% 27.1 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 3.6 4K Mixed 0.4 153% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 12.6% Great: 90%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 6TB 10,357 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 673GB free Firmware: D781 SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.8 9 8.8 8.8 8.9 8.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	12.5% Very poor	Read 33.5 Write 37.8 Mixed 31.5 SusWrite 8.9 21% 27.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 3.5 4K Mixed 0.5 150% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 12.5% Great: 90%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 6TB 10,357 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 296GB free Firmware: D781 SusWrite @10s intervals: 9 8.9 8.8 8.8 9 8.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	12.7% Very poor	Read 34 Write 36.5 Mixed 31.1 SusWrite 8.9 21% 27.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 3.4 4K Mixed 0.6 167% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 12.7% Great: 90%
hp v125w 8GB 541 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 7GB free, PID 3307 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5 4.5 5.3 5.2 5.3 5.3 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	5.51% Terrible	Read 20.7 Write 5.2 Mixed 5.2 SusWrite 5.1 10% 9.05 MB/s	4K Read 5.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 22% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.51% Great: 9%
WDC WD40 EZRX-00SPEB0 4TB 116 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	11.2% Very poor	Read 35.7 Write 37 Mixed 30.8 SusWrite 0 33% 25.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 102% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 11.2% Great: 61%
WDC WD40 EZRX-00SPEB0 4TB 116 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 975GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1 1.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	12.8% Very poor	Read 36.9 Write 37.2 Mixed 31.5 SusWrite 1.1 34% 26.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 115% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 12.8% Great: 61%
WDC WD40 EZRX-00SPEB0 4TB 116 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 127GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 36 Write 37.4 Mixed 29.4 44% 34.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 122% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 61%
Hitachi HDS5C3020ALA632 2TB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 743GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.3 7.7 7.8 7.8 7.2 9.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	11.5% Very poor	Read 36.5 Write 37.7 Mixed 32.3 SusWrite 7.9 37% 28.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 74% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.5% Great: 50%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB 1,963 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	21.3% Poor	MC Read 7.8 MC Write 8.6 MC Mixed 8.2 23% 8.2 GB/s	SC Read 2.9 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 3.4 10% 3.6 GB/s	Latency 262 15% 262 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 21.3% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical XXXXXX Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 28%

Raft

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Zotac XXXXXX

CPU
Celeron N3150IntelBench 26%, 3,131 samples	19x
Core i7-4770RIntelBench 72%, 317 samples	14x
Core i5-4570RIntelBench 65%, 1,007 samples	2x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 60,712 samples	21x
Iris Pro HD 5200 (V1 Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 6%, 1,166 samples	16x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	1x

SSD
Ultra Plus 256GBSanDisk $139Bench 81%, 17,545 samples	4x
SSDNow mS200 mSATA 120GBKingston $100Bench 67%, 901 samples	2x
M500 480GBCrucial $84Bench 83%, 9,168 samples	2x

RAM
F3 DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 65%, 318 samples	3x
99U5428-018.A00LF 1x8GBKingstonBench 26%, 6,120 samples	2x
9905469-157.A00LF 1x4GBKingstonBench 22%, 198 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 8% - Terrible

Total price: $139

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16