Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 34% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	4.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	21.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X3210 223 User benchmarks, average bench 42% LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	34.6% Below average	Memory 52.9 1-Core 24.7 2-Core 48.5 29% 42 Pts	4-Core 97.9 8-Core 87 13% 92.4 Pts	64-Core 83.7 5% 83.7 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 34.6% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4670 21,442 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Asus(1043 0276) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	4.37% Terrible	Lighting 5.2 Reflection 8 Parallax 3.7 4% 5.63 fps	MRender 4.9 Gravity 4 Splatting 7.3 5% 5.4 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.37% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Kingston SVP100S296G 96GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 64GB free (System drive) Firmware: CJR10202 SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 99 75 89 98 127 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	21.7% Poor	Read 160 Write 1.3 Mixed 61.3 SusWrite 93.5 17% 79.2 MB/s	4K Read 7.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 12.5 29% 7.33 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 21.7% Great: 69%
WD Red 1TB (2012)-$89 37,583 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 926GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 161 161 161 162 162 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	91.7% Outstanding	Read 159 Write 140 Mixed 79.7 SusWrite 160 99% 135 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 199% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 91.7% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	15.3% Very poor	MC Read 6.2 MC Write 4.7 MC Mixed 4.8 15% 5.23 GB/s	SC Read 3.7 SC Write 2.6 SC Mixed 3 9% 3.1 GB/s	Latency 150 27% 150 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 15.3% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Xeon X5470IntelBench 54%, 1,638 samples	2x
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	2x
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $150Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	2x

GPU
GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples	1x
GTX 780-TiNvidia $410Bench 53%, 30,815 samples	1x
GeForce GT 220NvidiaBench 2%, 19,671 samples	1x

SSD
Green 120GB (2018)WD $59Bench 43%, 69,933 samples	2x
SVP100S296G 96GBKingstonBench 64%, 7 samples	1x
S511 120GBAdataBench 68%, 604 samples	1x

Value: 5% - Terrible

Total price: $59