Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 42% Speed boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	6.11% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X3210 223 User benchmarks, average bench 42% Socket 423, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	47.2% Average	Memory 73.7 1-Core 30.6 2-Core 61.3 38% 55.2 Pts	4-Core 123 8-Core 122 16% 122 Pts	64-Core 123 8% 123 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 47.2% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 340X 2,285 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Dell(1028 0083) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.5.2 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	6.11% Terrible	Lighting 8.3 Reflection 7 Parallax 10.9 7% 8.73 fps	MRender 4.4 Gravity 9.3 Splatting 4.5 5% 6.07 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.11% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD WD1002FBYS-02A6B0 1TB 28,278 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 856GB free (System drive) Firmware: 03.00C06 SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 92 79 81 88 85 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	52.5% Above average	Read 98.2 Write 97.7 Mixed 73.3 SusWrite 84.2 65% 88.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.8 168% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 52.5% Great: 62%
USB DISK 2.0 16GB 842 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 6GB free, PID 0121 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8 7.9 7.4 7.9 7.1 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 7.2 Write 3 SusWrite 7 7% 5.73 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 2% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	20.4% Poor	MC Read 7.3 MC Write 5.9 MC Mixed 6 18% 6.4 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 5.9 SC Mixed 6 17% 5.8 GB/s	Latency 93.1 43% 93.1 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 20.4% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
Xeon X3220Intel $99Bench 43%, 790 samples	2x
Pentium E5700Intel $22Bench 36%, 20,872 samples	1x
Core2 Quad Q9400Intel $170Bench 46%, 24,176 samples	1x

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $99