Acer Nitro AN715-51

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.12% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive38.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Nitro AN715-51  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Citigo_CFS
Memory8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200409
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 19 '21 at 18:43
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Memory 93.1
1-Core 117
2-Core 238
84% 149 Pts
4-Core 410
8-Core 607
63% 509 Pts
64-Core 768
48% 768 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Acer(1025 1338) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8682
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
5.12% Terrible
Lighting 7.9
Reflection 65
Parallax 10.8
6% 27.9 fps
MRender 10.8
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 0.1
3% 3.73 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.12%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-e100n 512G 512GB
132GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1127B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 51 30 70 43 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
38.7% Below average
Read 412
Write 49.7
Mixed 17.2
SusWrite 45.3
28% 131 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 9.5
4K Mixed 0.6
45% 12 MB/s
DQ Read 173
DQ Write 165
DQ Mixed 0.7
47% 113 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 106%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
413GB free
Firmware: ACM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 148 164 121 154 162 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Read 113
Write 144
Mixed 64
SusWrite 151
86% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
151% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR26D4S9S8ME-8 86D3 SP008GBSFU266B02 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
77.8% Very good
MC Read 30.9
MC Write 29.5
MC Mixed 22
78% 27.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 28.9
SC Mixed 23.5
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 61.9
65% 61.9 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nitro AN715-51 Builds (Compare 906 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN715-51

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $373WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback