Gigabyte GA-X99-Ultra Gaming-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics81.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive90.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Default string
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X99-Ultra Gaming-CF  (all builds)
Memory27.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160829
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 14 '17 at 04:48
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6800K-$103
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Memory 91.9
1-Core 110
2-Core 249
84% 150 Pts
4-Core 490
8-Core 870
82% 680 Pts
64-Core 1,041
64% 1,041 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 384.76
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81.8% Excellent
Lighting 101
Reflection 117
Parallax 117
82% 112 fps
MRender 95.1
Gravity 100
Splatting 100
81% 98.6 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7KM120 120GB
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 003Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
90.8% Outstanding
Read 482
Write 453
Mixed 473
105% 469 MB/s
4K Read 34.9
4K Write 77.6
4K Mixed 25.5
127% 46 MB/s
DQ Read 41.1
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 32
56% 104 MB/s
Poor: 91%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 103%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
931GB free
Firmware: 1A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 218
Write 176
Mixed 174
142% 190 MB/s
4K Read 1.24
4K Write 2.59
4K Mixed 0.35
139% 1.39 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 113%
Great: 109%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
931GB free, PID 2322
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Read 29.4
Write 25.9
Mixed 14.1
28% 23.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.15
4K Write 1.61
4K Mixed 0.16
65% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK8GX4M2B3000C15 CMK8GX4M2B3000C15 CMU16GX4M2C3000C15 CMK8GX4M2B3000C15 CMK8GX4M2B3000C15 CMU16GX4M2C3000C15 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096, 8192, 4096, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 37.8
MC Write 43.7
MC Mixed 36.1
112% 39.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 19.9
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 64.3
62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 100%
This bench: 102%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X99-Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 367 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99-Ultra Gaming-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 124% - Outstanding Total price: $403
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback