Gigabyte GA-X99-Ultra Gaming-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Sail boat	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (94th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 6 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	29% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	98.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Default string
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X99-Ultra Gaming-CF (all builds)
Memory	29.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160829
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 27 '17 at 18:36
Run Duration	151 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	8%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6800K-$103 50,196 User benchmarks, average bench 81% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	89.3% Excellent	Memory 91.8 1-Core 122 2-Core 241 86% 152 Pts	4-Core 466 8-Core 825 78% 646 Pts	64-Core 1,038 64% 1,038 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 89.3% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 8599) CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 384.94 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29% Poor	Lighting 32.9 Reflection 38 Parallax 30.6 27% 33.8 fps	MRender 46.5 Gravity 32.7 Splatting 42.7 33% 40.6 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7KM120 120GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 76GB free (System drive) Firmware: 003Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 767 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 643 (B1) Unknown 99 99 37 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 962 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 54 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 9 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 252 (F1) Unknown 99 99 7555395886 (F2) Unknown 99 99 7451833646 (F3) Unknown 100 100 0 (F4) Unknown 100 100 0 (F5) Unknown 100 100 65535 (F6) Unknown 100 100 65535 (F7) Unknown 100 100 65535 (FB) Unknown 100 100 9662774312	98.6% Outstanding	Read 487 Write 460 Mixed 475 106% 474 MB/s	4K Read 29.4 4K Write 67.9 4K Mixed 38.3 130% 45.2 MB/s	DQ Read 300 DQ Write 182 DQ Mixed 139 131% 207 MB/s
Poor: 91% ↑ This bench: 98.6% Great: 103%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 931GB free Firmware: 1A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 174 171 2266 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 922 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 734 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 557 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 205 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 717 (C2) HDA temperature 108 101 35 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	105% Outstanding	Read 191 Write 176 Mixed 172 135% 180 MB/s	4K Read 1.27 4K Write 2.73 4K Mixed 0.31 138% 1.44 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 109%
Seagate Expansion 1TB 60,540 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 931GB free Firmware: 9300 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	63.6% Good	Read 119 Write 102 Mixed 91 78% 104 MB/s	4K Read 1.57 4K Write 1.78 4K Mixed 0.13 112% 1.16 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 63.6% Great: 66%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMK8GX4M2B3000C15 CMK8GX4M2B3000C15 CMU16GX4M2C3000C15 CMK8GX4M2B3000C15 CMK8GX4M2B3000C15 CMU16GX4M2C3000C15 32GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 4096, 4096, 8192, 4096, 4096, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	MC Read 37.8 MC Write 44 MC Mixed 35.7 112% 39.2 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 22.1 SC Mixed 19.2 52% 18.4 GB/s	Latency 64.3 62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 100% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 102%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X99-Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 366 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 88%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 79%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99-Ultra Gaming-CF

CPU
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	140x
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	80x
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	45x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	54x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	48x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	28x

SSD
990 Pro M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 402%, 34,940 samples	13x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	12x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $140Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	9x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	14x
9965600-033.A00G 4x16GBUnknownBench 99%, 23 samples	9x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $105Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 128% - Outstanding

Total price: $388

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363