Today's hottest deals

Asus H97M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive51.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardAsus H97M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160222
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 17 '17 at 10:33
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Memory 92
1-Core 106
2-Core 204
78% 134 Pts
4-Core 410
8-Core 410
55% 410 Pts
64-Core 408
25% 408 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 384.76
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Lighting 148
Reflection 159
Parallax 140
121% 149 fps
MRender 123
Gravity 142
Splatting 114
102% 126 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 112%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
252GB free
Firmware: EXT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 344
Mixed 305
85% 383 MB/s
4K Read 42.1
4K Write 66.3
4K Mixed 27.6
134% 45.3 MB/s
DQ Read 284
DQ Write 209
DQ Mixed 68.4
100% 187 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 126%
Volume0 180GB
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0. Max speed: Unknown
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Read 415
Write 119
Mixed 170
51% 235 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 68.5
4K Mixed 7.86
80% 32.9 MB/s
DQ Read 98.9
DQ Write 115
DQ Mixed 37.1
47% 83.8 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 72%
WD WD40EZRZ-00WN9B0 2TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
73.9% Very good
Read 126
Write 131
Mixed 106
91% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.99
4K Write 2.33
4K Mixed 0.31
118% 1.21 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 0420 F3-17000CL9-4GBXM HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 0420 F3-17000CL9-4GBXM 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
63.2% Good
MC Read 22.4
MC Write 23.4
MC Mixed 20.5
63% 22.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 19.9
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 64.2
62% 64.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,011 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H97M-PLUS - $111

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $341
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback