Today's hottest deals

HP 14 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive76.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP 14 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 218B
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131016
Uptime3.7 Days
Run DateJun 21 '21 at 12:46
Run Duration344 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 2020M
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Memory 86
1-Core 65.8
2-Core 122
58% 91.4 Pts
4-Core 126
8-Core 132
17% 129 Pts
64-Core 130
8% 130 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)
HP(103C 218B) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
1.46% Terrible
Lighting 1.6
Reflection 1.3
Parallax 1.4
1% 1.43 fps
MRender 3.4
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 2.1
2% 2.2 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.46%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 240GB-$70
138GB free (System drive)
Firmware: XA003R17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 389 388 395 396 390 125 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
76.9% Very good
Read 429
Write 394
Mixed 349
SusWrite 347
85% 380 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 46.1
4K Mixed 27.4
92% 31.6 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 261
DQ Mixed 218
166% 222 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5773DH0-YK0 Hynix HMT325S6EFR8A-PB 4GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
52.9% Above average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 20.2
MC Mixed 17.8
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 14.3
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 71.2
56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 20: 2R 3G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
20% 4% 134 23 19 60 13.9" 1366 768 BOE05B5
History: Score 12: 1R 2G 1B | Score 7: 0R 2G 1B | Score 25: 4R 1G 2B | Score 16: 3R 0G 1B | Score 20: 2R 3G 1B
Typical 14 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 618 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 14 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback