Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics40.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3397
Memory20.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190410
Uptime2.6 Days
Run DateJun 21 '21 at 22:57
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$69
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3470 CPU @ 3.20GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
70.6% Very good
Memory 78.9
1-Core 96
2-Core 187
69% 121 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 345
48% 355 Pts
64-Core 361
22% 361 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$152
CLim: 2235 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 462.59
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
40.1% Average
Lighting 50
Reflection 64.7
Parallax 40.1
41% 51.6 fps
MRender 42.7
Gravity 51.8
Splatting 47.8
39% 47.4 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
407GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 257 326 342 349 372 356 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Read 454
Write 325
Mixed 285
SusWrite 334
78% 350 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 60
4K Mixed 28.6
102% 36.9 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 268
223% 322 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 133%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$35
382GB free
Firmware: MS2OA7C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 130 124 135 138 138 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Read 134
Write 120
Mixed 32.6
SusWrite 131
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GU6AFR8A-PB Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6D1 HMT41GU6AFR8A-PB Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6D1 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57.3% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 17.5
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 17.5
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 82.6
48% 82.6 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 31.5" 1280 720 DELD105 DELL S3221QS
Typical Compaq Elite 8300 SFF Builds (Compare 5,565 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback