Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics43.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3397
Memory19.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190410
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 13 '22 at 00:05
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1275 V2-$400
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1275 V2 @ 3.50GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
68.8% Good
Memory 82
1-Core 96.9
2-Core 148
66% 109 Pts
4-Core 301
8-Core 452
47% 376 Pts
64-Core 470
29% 470 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$152
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.2% Average
Lighting 56.3
Reflection 56.9
Parallax 48.7
46% 54 fps
MRender 42
Gravity 50.3
Splatting 46.1
38% 46.1 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
128GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 178 178 180 181 174 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
71.2% Very good
Read 447
Write 168
Mixed 255
SusWrite 180
58% 262 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 45.7
4K Mixed 28.6
97% 32.7 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 129
135% 227 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 133%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$35
289GB free
Firmware: MS2OA7C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 103 102 107 109 123 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Read 147
Write 123
Mixed 32.6
SusWrite 110
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
133% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GU6AFR8A-PB Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6D1 HMT41GU6AFR8A-PB Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6D1 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.1% Above average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 16
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 15.6
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 77
52% 77 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Elite 8300 SFF Builds (Compare 5,565 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback