Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Acer AO725

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 23% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	40.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Acer AO725 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer ZA10_BZ
Memory	0.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120906
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jun 24 '21 at 04:02
Run Duration	236 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD C-70 APU (2012 M.Za) 922 User benchmarks, average bench 22% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	22.8% Poor	Memory 42.4 1-Core 13.4 2-Core 17.7 19% 24.5 Pts	4-Core 20.8 8-Core 23.1 3% 22 Pts	64-Core 24.6 2% 24.6 Pts
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 22.8% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7290 821 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 0740) 256MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.47% Terrible	Lighting 0.5 Reflection 1.2 Parallax 0.5 0% 0.73 fps	MRender 1.6 Gravity 0.3 Splatting 0.4 1% 0.77 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.47% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$23 142,801 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 200GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR052 SusWrite @10s intervals: 274 212 205 286 247 117 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	40.4% Average	Read 362 Write 298 Mixed 309 SusWrite 224 67% 298 MB/s	4K Read 12.8 4K Write 16.1 4K Mixed 4.5 34% 11.1 MB/s	DQ Read 63.6 DQ Write 54.9 DQ Mixed 23.3 27% 47.3 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 40.4% Great: 92%
Generic Flash Disk 16GB 18,883 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 11GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 11 10 12 11 11 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	4.15% Terrible	Read 11 Write 11.2 Mixed 5 SusWrite 11.2 13% 9.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 2% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.15% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR512X64D3S16C11G 1x4GB 786 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	9.25% Terrible	MC Read 3.1 MC Write 2.5 MC Mixed 3.7 9% 3.1 GB/s	SC Read 1.5 SC Write 1.9 SC Mixed 1 4% 1.47 GB/s	Latency 192 21% 192 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 9.25% Great: 33%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	6	60	11.6"	1280 720	AUO325C

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical AO725 Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 1%

Tree trunk

Desktop 12%

Tree trunk

Workstation 1%

Tree trunk

System: Acer AO725

CPU
C-70 APU (2012 M.Za)AMDBench 22%, 922 samples	15x
C-60 APUAMDBench 23%, 2,297 samples	13x

GPU
Radeon HD 7290AMDBench 1%, 821 samples	15x
Radeon HD 6290AMDBench 1%, 2,442 samples	13x

SSD
128GB 128GBNetacBench 58%, 1,666 samples	2x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	2x
MZ7TE128HMGR-00004 128GBSamsungBench 66%, 696 samples	1x

RAM
EBJ20UF8BDU0-GN-F 1x2GBElpidaBench 17%, 293 samples	6x
ACR512X64D3S16C11G 1x4GBKingstonBench 24%, 786 samples	2x
EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F 1x4GBElpidaBench 26%, 5,316 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406

Acer AO725

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: Acer AO725

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)