Today's hottest deals

HP Z800 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics99.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive41.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Z800 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0AECh
Memory15.6 GB free of 24.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180305
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateJun 30 '21 at 17:02
Run Duration242 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5660
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Memory 91.8
1-Core 73.8
2-Core 142
63% 102 Pts
4-Core 276
8-Core 448
44% 362 Pts
64-Core 1,080
67% 1,080 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Asus(1043 8681) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.47
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
99.7% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 102
Parallax 121
98% 114 fps
MRender 163
Gravity 123
Splatting 105
104% 130 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 240GB-$59
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 88 98 95 98 104 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.4% Average
Read 177
Write 172
Mixed 151
SusWrite 96
34% 149 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 46.2
4K Mixed 25
83% 29.6 MB/s
DQ Read 26.3
DQ Write 80.5
DQ Mixed 35.7
32% 47.5 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 84%
Samsung MZ7PD256HAFV-000H7 256GB
116GB free
Firmware: DXM05H6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 205 208 212 210 210 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
55.9% Above average
Read 228
Write 211
Mixed 190
SusWrite 209
47% 210 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 46.2
4K Mixed 29.2
101% 33.8 MB/s
DQ Read 32.9
DQ Write 84.7
DQ Mixed 41.7
37% 53.1 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 108%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 429GB
217GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 53 53 53 50 53 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48.4% Average
Read 218
Write 209
Mixed 198
SusWrite 52.8
38% 169 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 44.6
4K Mixed 33.1
108% 35.1 MB/s
DQ Read 36.5
DQ Write 78.8
DQ Mixed 48.3
39% 54.5 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 131%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 68GB
32GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 53 52 53 50 58 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48.1% Average
Read 224
Write 217
Mixed 197
SusWrite 53
39% 173 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 44.1
4K Mixed 33.5
106% 34.6 MB/s
DQ Read 36.5
DQ Write 78.7
DQ Mixed 48.7
40% 54.6 MB/s
Poor: 91%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 115%
Hitachi HTS725032A9A364 320GB-$55
112GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 18 18 18 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Read 32.3
Write 28.2
Mixed 25.3
SusWrite 17.7
19% 25.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
119% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 57%
Toshiba External USB 3.0 2TB
803GB free, PID d010
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 25 25 25 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Read 29.7
Write 25.7
Mixed 25
SusWrite 24.8
35% 26.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.5
84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 58%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 3TB
1.5TB free, PID d000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 16 16 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Read 28.9
Write 25.6
Mixed 25.4
SusWrite 15.9
32% 24 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.5
84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT151R7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PY1G4D1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PY1G4D1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PY1G4D1 ID:80 AD HMT151R7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PY1G4D1 58GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50% Average
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 19.7
53% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 7.8
20% 6.9 GB/s
Latency 64.5
62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 50%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 7 5 60 33.9" 1280 720 LHC3500 UWQHD-100-V2
Typical Z800 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,019 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z800 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback