Today's hottest deals

Huananzhi X99-TF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHuananzhi X99-TF  (all builds)
MotherboardHUANANZHI X99-TF
Memory28.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210120
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJul 08 '21 at 15:09
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2682 v4
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
74.9% Very good
Memory 78.8
1-Core 98.4
2-Core 195
71% 124 Pts
4-Core 382
8-Core 741
67% 561 Pts
64-Core 1,990
123% 1,990 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
MSI(1462 8A9F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
3.03% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 4.5
Parallax 1.2
3% 3.13 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 4.1
Splatting 3.3
3% 3.8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.03%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU630 240GB
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N191129a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 50 35 31 51 44 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
47.5% Average
Read 436
Write 408
Mixed 240
SusWrite 39.3
62% 281 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 21.6
4K Mixed 21
80% 23.3 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 35.5
DQ Mixed 50.4
43% 65.4 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 101%
Kllisre 1TB 1TB
1TB free
Firmware: T0709A3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1451 1473 1388 1499 1496 1451 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
233% Outstanding
Read 1,989
Write 1,485
Mixed 1,042
SusWrite 1,460
334% 1,494 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 18.2
124% 50.7 MB/s
DQ Read 682
DQ Write 600
DQ Mixed 283
310% 522 MB/s
Poor: 97%
This bench: 233%
Great: 233%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 138 138 139 139 139 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
78.8% Very good
Read 136
Write 124
Mixed 85.5
SusWrite 138
89% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 83%
SMI USB DISK 32GB
26GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 16 19 19 19 21 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
24% Poor
Read 103
Write 45.5
Mixed 71.3
SusWrite 20.9
72% 60.1 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1.8
117% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 24%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (100th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
107% Outstanding
MC Read 46.4
MC Write 45.2
MC Mixed 36.1
122% 42.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 17.1
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 82.8
48% 82.8 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 107%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-TF Builds (Compare 339 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft

System: Huananzhi X99-TF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 118% - Outstanding Total price: $59
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $376WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback