Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics3.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory28.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210320
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 26 '21 at 14:44
Run Duration327 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$124
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 91.6
1-Core 160
2-Core 320
103% 191 Pts
4-Core 628
8-Core 952
98% 790 Pts
64-Core 1,171
72% 1,171 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 104%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
EVGA(3842 2711) 1GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 466.11
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.57% Terrible
Lighting 4.3
Reflection 4.5
Parallax 4.5
4% 4.43 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5
4% 4.43 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.57%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Netac 240GB 240GB
120GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW200918
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 222 133 137 116 59 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
62.5% Good
Read 366
Write 245
Mixed 282
SusWrite 140
58% 258 MB/s
4K Read 36.1
4K Write 74.1
4K Mixed 12.6
110% 40.9 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 166
DQ Mixed 13.4
56% 126 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 93%
Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP2000GM30002 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: STNSC014
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3885 4026 4016 2796 1279 1307 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
418% Outstanding
Read 1,956
Write 2,038
Mixed 2,275
SusWrite 2885
519% 2,288 MB/s
4K Read 57.8
4K Write 241
4K Mixed 90.7
331% 130 MB/s
DQ Read 1,526
DQ Write 1,269
DQ Mixed 1,414
1,054% 1,403 MB/s
Poor: 173%
This bench: 418%
Great: 502%
Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP2000GM30002 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: STNSC014
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1825 1861 1860 1861 1867 1711 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
338% Outstanding
Read 1,734
Write 1,535
Mixed 1924
SusWrite 1,831
397% 1,756 MB/s
4K Read 56.1
4K Write 205
4K Mixed 86.2
304% 116 MB/s
DQ Read 1,474
DQ Write 1,352
DQ Mixed 1,468
1,086% 1,431 MB/s
Poor: 173%
This bench: 338%
Great: 502%
ST14000NM001G-2KJ103 14TB
9TB free
Firmware: SN03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 265 260 259 257 245 248 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.6% Average
Read 254
Write 249
Mixed 127
SusWrite 256
50% 222 MB/s
4K Read 36.1
4K Write 16.6
4K Mixed 1.4
65% 18 MB/s
DQ Read 5.1
DQ Write 13.2
DQ Mixed 1.6
3% 6.63 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 58%
Seagate ST16000NM002G 16TB
15TB free
Firmware: E003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 239 244 243 243 239 244 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
42.3% Average
Read 252
Write 241
Mixed 136
SusWrite 242
49% 218 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 15.7
4K Mixed 3
63% 17.3 MB/s
DQ Read 8.8
DQ Write 10.3
DQ Mixed 2.5
4% 7.2 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 42%
Seagate ST16000NM002G 16TB
15TB free
Firmware: E003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 259 260 263 278 258 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
45.4% Average
Read 251
Write 216
Mixed 124
SusWrite 262
48% 213 MB/s
4K Read 38
4K Write 15.7
4K Mixed 3.3
70% 19 MB/s
DQ Read 6
DQ Write 10.8
DQ Mixed 2.1
3% 6.3 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 42%
Seagate ST16000NM002G 16TB
15TB free
Firmware: E003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 239 236 236 241 245 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
43% Average
Read 242
Write 204
Mixed 124
SusWrite 239
46% 203 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 15.8
4K Mixed 3
68% 18.4 MB/s
DQ Read 7.5
DQ Write 12.5
DQ Mixed 2.3
4% 7.43 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 43%
Great: 42%
Seagate ST16000NM002G 16TB
15TB free
Firmware: E003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 237 242 240 245 237 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
42.9% Average
Read 226
Write 216
Mixed 136
SusWrite 238
46% 204 MB/s
4K Read 38.4
4K Write 15.8
4K Mixed 2.9
70% 19 MB/s
DQ Read 6.8
DQ Write 10
DQ Mixed 2.1
3% 6.3 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
97.9% Outstanding
MC Read 44.3
MC Write 22.8
MC Mixed 37.6
100% 34.9 GB/s
SC Read 30.9
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 38.6
88% 30.7 GB/s
Latency 64.8
62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 97.9%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 24" 1280 720 SAM0BBB S24D340
Typical TUF GAMING B550-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 2,377 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS (WI-FI)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $711
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $376WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $253Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback