Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Packard EasyNote TE11BZ (all builds)
Motherboard	Packard
Memory	3.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121226
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 02 '21 at 20:59
Run Duration	166 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E1-1200 APU 6,904 User benchmarks, average bench 23% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	18.1% Very poor	Memory 31.9 1-Core 16.1 2-Core 23.9 17% 24 Pts	4-Core 25.8 8-Core 29.6 4% 27.7 Pts	64-Core 25.5 2% 25.5 Pts
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 18.1% Great: 39%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 202GB free (System drive) Firmware: S3700100 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	Read 189 Write 175 Mixed 180 40% 181 MB/s	4K Read 9.4 4K Write 13.4 4K Mixed 9.8 34% 10.9 MB/s	DQ Read 68.2 DQ Write 58.6 DQ Mixed 65.8 49% 64.2 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 100%
USB DISK 2.0 8GB 5,616 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 3GB free, PID 4200 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 13.8 Write 5.5 Mixed 6.7 10% 8.67 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.2 23% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Elpida EBJ20UF8BDU0-GN-F Kingston ACR512X64D3S16C11G 6GB 88 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 800, 800 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	9.55% Terrible	MC Read 3.5 MC Write 2.5 MC Mixed 3.6 9% 3.2 GB/s	SC Read 2 SC Write 1.8 SC Mixed 3.2 7% 2.33 GB/s	Latency 244 16% 244 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.55% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	1	1	64	0"	1280 720

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 25%

Raft

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

SSD
Solid State Disk 120GBSpccBench 59%, 22,489 samples	2x
Sata III 120GBIntensoBench 68%, 2,648 samples	1x
Premier Pro SP310 mSATA 32GBAdata $40Bench 50%, 8 samples	1x

RAM
HMT451S6MFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 2,522 samples	3x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 M471B5173QH0-YK0 8GBSamsungBench 46%, 2,529 samples	2x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 30,873 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16