Today's hottest deals

Asus G20BM_A68

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics28.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus G20BM_A68  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G20BM_A68
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170219
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 04 '21 at 17:22
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-770K (2014 D.Ka)
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
42.4% Average
Memory 51.6
1-Core 64.5
2-Core 120
45% 78.6 Pts
4-Core 192
8-Core 193
26% 193 Pts
64-Core 193
12% 193 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
PNY(196E 1138) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1468 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.9% Poor
Lighting 41.8
Reflection 45.3
Parallax 42.8
34% 43.3 fps
MRender 38.3
Gravity 40.6
Splatting 0.2
19% 26.4 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9SB8W128G 128GB
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X6107000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 112 105 105 104 106 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 330
Write 114
Mixed 197
SusWrite 108
41% 187 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 63.5
4K Mixed 19.6
103% 37.4 MB/s
DQ Read 253
DQ Write 199
DQ Mixed 201
157% 218 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 90%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$77
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 140 139 146 146 146 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Read 149
Write 135
Mixed 71.1
SusWrite 140
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.5
130% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 M471B1G73EB0-YK0 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.1% Below average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 8
MC Mixed 15.1
37% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 9.7
22% 7.87 GB/s
Latency 155
26% 155 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 7: 1R 0G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
7% 14% 22 104 5 60 24" 1920 1080 BNQ7840 BenQ G2420HD
Typical G20BM_A68 Builds (Compare 42 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G20BM_A68

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $280
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback