Asus H61M-CS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics55.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus H61M-CS  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140721
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 08 '21 at 08:08
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Memory 87.2
1-Core 98.6
2-Core 196
74% 127 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 377
50% 374 Pts
64-Core 377
23% 377 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 590-$80
CLim: 1545 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.7.2
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55.2% Above average
Lighting 69.4
Reflection 67.9
Parallax 96.2
57% 77.8 fps
MRender 68.5
Gravity 75.8
Splatting 53.1
53% 65.8 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
GAM X 240G 240GB
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1125A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 229 228 232 234 233 MB/s
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
56.9% Above average
Read 253
Write 221
Mixed 229
SusWrite 231
53% 234 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 46.8
4K Mixed 19.2
80% 28.7 MB/s
DQ Read 196
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 29.5
67% 139 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 90%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
322GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 158 157 170 173 171 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
89% Excellent
Read 147
Write 141
Mixed 31.1
SusWrite 164
87% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
146% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 89%
Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$28
552GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 178 176 180 180 181 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
97.6% Outstanding
Read 162
Write 122
Mixed 72.6
SusWrite 178
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
158% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 97.6%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend TS1GLK64V3H Samsung M378B1G73QH0-YK0 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52.6% Above average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 16.5
51% 18 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 16.9
SC Mixed 16.6
47% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 70.3
57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 144 24.1" 1280 720 SAM0F91 LC24RG50
Typical H61M-CS Builds (Compare 172 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H61M-CS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $85
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback