Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	56.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2310-$90 15,623 User benchmarks, average bench 65% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	68% Good	Memory 84.3 1-Core 77.7 2-Core 157 64% 106 Pts	4-Core 303 8-Core 288 40% 296 Pts	64-Core 303 19% 303 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% MSI(1462 8A9F) 2GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	3.3% Terrible	Lighting 4 Reflection 4.5 Parallax 1.3 3% 3.27 fps	MRender 5.4 Gravity 4.1 Splatting 3.3 3% 4.27 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.3% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$20 61,417 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 107GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS900613 SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 142 145 62 107 62 MB/s Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	56.3% Above average	Read 244 Write 232 Mixed 213 SusWrite 115 45% 201 MB/s	4K Read 26.9 4K Write 47.2 4K Mixed 28.5 102% 34.2 MB/s	DQ Read 207 DQ Write 151 DQ Mixed 25.2 61% 128 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 56.3% Great: 91%
Toshiba MK3252GSX 320GB-$70 3,538 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 276GB free Firmware: LV011C SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 57 60 60 60 60 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	33.8% Below average	Read 58.4 Write 55.2 Mixed 37.6 SusWrite 59.2 39% 52.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.5 100% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 33.8% Great: 34%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown GR1333D364L9/4G Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 8GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	51.1% Above average	MC Read 17.9 MC Write 18.9 MC Mixed 16.3 51% 17.7 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 14.7 SC Mixed 15.4 42% 14.8 GB/s	Latency 72.9 55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 51.1% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
20%	38%	26	22	5	60	17"	1680 1050	SAM0161 SyncMaster

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM