| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 16% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 62.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asus H81M-C (all builds) |
| Memory | 4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180326 |
| Uptime | 0.4 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 02 '23 at 21:49 |
| Run Duration | 128 Seconds |
| Run User | BGR-User |
| Background CPU | 9% |
PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3-$203
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
|
70.2%
Very good
|
67% 116 Pts
|
48% 389 Pts
|
29% 474 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 532.03
|
16%
Very poor
|
16% 20.6 fps
|
16% 20 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
300GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK66B5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 152 161 107 150 182 MB/s
|
62.7%
Good
|
39% 174 MB/s
|
118% 40.1 MB/s
|
120% 164 MB/s
|
|
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$22
66GB free
Firmware: 58.01D58
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 57 56 57 57 53 MB/s
|
25.7%
Poor
|
34% 45.9 MB/s
|
134% 1.03 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown GR1333D364L9/4G Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
47.2%
Average
|
46% 16.2 GB/s
|
41% 14.3 GB/s
|
53% 74.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H81M-C Builds (Compare 3,036 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H81M-C - $60
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 469x |
| Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 299x |
| Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples | 223x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 305x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 204x |
| HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples | 174x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $297 |