Today's hottest deals

Asus X99-DELUXE II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics59.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive84.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus X99-DELUXE II  (all builds)
Memory27 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161109
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateSep 04 '21 at 15:35
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6800K-$90
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Memory 90.3
1-Core 116
2-Core 234
83% 147 Pts
4-Core 476
8-Core 723
74% 599 Pts
64-Core 927
57% 927 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
59.4% Above average
Lighting 73.6
Reflection 77.5
Parallax 71.6
60% 74.2 fps
MRender 68.5
Gravity 75.3
Splatting 69.8
58% 71.2 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial_CT525MX3 525GB
336GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R021
SusWrite @10s intervals: 353 344 342 225 234 217 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Read 315
Write 422
Mixed 239
SusWrite 286
71% 316 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 82.7
4K Mixed 38.9
130% 48.6 MB/s
DQ Read 353
DQ Write 281
DQ Mixed 248
204% 294 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 98%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$75
3TB free
Firmware: CC54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 177 177 174 177 176 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 175
Write 173
Mixed 88.7
SusWrite 176
112% 153 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 101%
Great: 96%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$75
2.5TB free
Firmware: CC54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 150 152 153 150 152 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Read 147
Write 114
Mixed 83.3
SusWrite 151
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
124% Outstanding
MC Read 45
MC Write 55.4
MC Mixed 46.4
140% 48.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 19.5
SC Mixed 21.7
53% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 66.8
60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 124%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 23" 1280 720 ACI23B1 ASUS PA238
Typical X99-DELUXE II Builds (Compare 891 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus X99-DELUXE II - $452

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $837
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback