MSI MS-16P6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics32.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive84.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star GL63 8RD
MotherboardMSI MS-16P6  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190522
Uptime12.9 Days
Run DateSep 10 '21 at 15:38
Run Duration216 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Memory 87
1-Core 126
2-Core 244
85% 153 Pts
4-Core 452
8-Core 646
69% 549 Pts
64-Core 632
39% 632 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)
MSI(1462 1219) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9085
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
32.1% Below average
Lighting 41.6
Reflection 41.5
Parallax 39.2
34% 40.8 fps
MRender 38.3
Gravity 42
Splatting 27.5
29% 35.9 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ldlc F6+M.2 480 480GB
385GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1022A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 400 402 408 406 405 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Read 490
Write 392
Mixed 364
SusWrite 402
92% 412 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 70.6
4K Mixed 22.7
100% 38.5 MB/s
DQ Read 190
DQ Write 280
DQ Mixed 38.7
84% 170 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 94%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
802GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3U0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 132 129 131 126 127 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
63.8% Good
Read 94.6
Write 98.2
Mixed 21.1
SusWrite 128
62% 85.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
122% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 75%
SDXC Card 64GB
34GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
9.91% Terrible
Read 25.5
Write 16.9
Mixed 16.7
SusWrite 20.6
26% 19.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 1
57% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.91%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16ATF2G64HZ-2G6J1 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
49.2% Average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 14.1
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 16.9
48% 17 GB/s
Latency 70.4
57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 33: 3R 4G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
33% 42% 31 69 56 60 15.5" 1536 864 CMN15D6
History: Score 26: 2R 4G 4B | Score 33: 3R 4G 6B
Typical MS-16P6 Builds (Compare 1,322 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16P6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback