ECS H61H2-M12

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardECS H61H2-M12  (all builds)
Memory2.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111207
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 18 '21 at 11:26
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G620-$30
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Memory 78.9
1-Core 68
2-Core 130
56% 92.1 Pts
4-Core 126
8-Core 128
17% 127 Pts
64-Core 132
8% 132 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9500 GT
Zotac(19DA 6045) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.44
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
1.27% Terrible
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 3
Parallax 1
2% 1.97 fps
MRender 0.9
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 0.9
1% 0.9 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.27%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Richdisk device 75GB
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 21 20 21 21 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
30.3% Below average
Read 80.5
Write 50.3
Mixed 60.1
SusWrite 20.6
40% 52.9 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 7.7
4K Mixed 3.1
770% 5.87 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 29%
Richdisk device 1TB
383GB free
Firmware: 1010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 21 20 21 21 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.4% Poor
Read 77.6
Write 49.5
Mixed 60.9
SusWrite 20.6
39% 52.2 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 7.3
4K Mixed 6.7
1,146% 6.8 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingmax FLFF65F-C8KF9 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
24.4% Poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 7.7
MC Mixed 7.4
22% 7.57 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 7.7
22% 7.8 GB/s
Latency 82.5
48% 82.5 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61H2-M12 Builds (Compare 448 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS H61H2-M12

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $77
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $251WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback