Biostar A55MG+

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardBiostar A55MG+  (all builds)
Memory0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120417
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 07 '18 at 01:52
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4440 @
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.3% Average
Memory 55.4
1-Core 45.9
2-Core 86.7
39% 62.7 Pts
4-Core 157
8-Core 165
21% 161 Pts
64-Core 176
11% 176 Pts
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6670
XFX(1682 3181) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 14.501.1003.0
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 7.03
Reflection 7.31
Parallax 6.94
6% 7.09 fps
Splatting 5.3
6% 5.3 fps
Poor: 5% Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Richdisk device 512GB
30GB free
Firmware: 1010
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
9.15% Terrible
Read 70.8
Write 50.1
Mixed 59.1
13% 60 MB/s
4K Read 2.67
4K Write 4.18
4K Mixed 3.22
10% 3.36 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.15%
Great: 14%
Richdisk device 2TB
313GB free
Firmware: 1010
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.7% Below average
Read 72.8
Write 44.6
Mixed 55
43% 57.5 MB/s
4K Read 6.43
4K Write 5.52
4K Mixed 2.29
624% 4.74 MB/s
Richdisk device 1TB
211GB free
Firmware: 1010
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.1% Below average
Read 68.7
Write 43.5
Mixed 59.4
43% 57.2 MB/s
4K Read 5.45
4K Write 5.35
4K Mixed 3.46
711% 4.76 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 33%
Richdisk device 54GB
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1010
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Read 74.2
Write 50.2
Mixed 55.5
45% 60 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 6.18
4K Mixed 3.62
762% 5.23 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5474-010.A00LF 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.4% Below average
MC Read 12.5
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 9.7
32% 11.3 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 5.3
16% 5.77 GB/s
Latency 142
28% 142 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A55MG+ Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

Motherboard: Biostar A55MG+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $251WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback