Today's hottest deals

Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Mid 2021) - RZ09-0409

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics81.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive389% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemRazer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Mid 2021) - RZ09-0409  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer CH570
Memory23.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210806
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 22 '21 at 13:27
Run Duration262 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Memory 68.9
1-Core 115
2-Core 334
87% 173 Pts
4-Core 519
8-Core 716
78% 618 Pts
64-Core 839
52% 839 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 94%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1A58 2018) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9778
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
8.08% Terrible
Lighting 9.5
Reflection 92.1
Parallax 10.4
8% 37.3 fps
MRender 12.5
Gravity 9.5
Splatting 10.3
9% 10.8 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.08%
Great: 9%
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$449
Asus(1043 855B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81.5% Excellent
Lighting 101
Reflection 116
Parallax 107
83% 108 fps
MRender 98.6
Gravity 102
Splatting 91.9
80% 97.7 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme CA6-8D1024 1TB
847GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ERA0901 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3771 555 2327 1256 1202 646 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
389% Outstanding
Read 2,969
Write 4,018
Mixed 2715
SusWrite 1,626
638% 2,832 MB/s
4K Read 80.5
4K Write 252
4K Mixed 111
398% 148 MB/s
DQ Read 1,260
DQ Write 905
DQ Mixed 1,002
770% 1,056 MB/s
Poor: 167%
This bench: 389%
Great: 427%
Lacie Rugged FW USB3 1TB
690GB free
Firmware: 051E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 105 105 105 105 105 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
58.5% Above average
Read 103
Write 40.7
Mixed 46.7
SusWrite 102
54% 72.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
94% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43DB1-CWE 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
MC Read 38
MC Write 34.1
MC Mixed 31.1
98% 34.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.5
SC Write 41.3
SC Mixed 16.8
73% 25.5 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 33: 6R 0G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
33% 16% 56 50 7 165 15.5" 2560 1440 CMN152A
Typical Blade 15 Advanced Model (Mid 2021) - RZ09-0409 Builds (Compare 1,471 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Mid 2021) - RZ09-0409

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $139
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $72
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback