Today's hottest deals

Asus M51AC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus M51AC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M51AC
Memory26 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130625
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 26 '21 at 05:56
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$75
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Memory 81
1-Core 94.4
2-Core 198
71% 125 Pts
4-Core 355
8-Core 512
54% 433 Pts
64-Core 541
34% 541 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
MSI(1462 3366) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 126
Reflection 136
Parallax 127
102% 130 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 130
Splatting 114
97% 119 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 101%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$112
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 377 384 407 418 398 396 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 464
Write 445
Mixed 339
SusWrite 397
92% 411 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 89.9
4K Mixed 42.7
152% 55.2 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 346
263% 354 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 106%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58
587GB free
Firmware: CC24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 139 140 141 140 140 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Read 135
Write 136
Mixed 77.3
SusWrite 139
89% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 114%
Seagate ST4000NM0033-9ZM170 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: SN07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 171 173 171 174 174 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Read 156
Write 157
Mixed 80.5
SusWrite 172
103% 141 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.1
218% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 105%
Generic- USB3.0 CRW-CF/MD 64GB
44GB free, PID 0301
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 128 132 136 133 134 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 122
Write 122
Mixed 49.6
SusWrite 132
142% 106 MB/s
4K Read 12.2
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 3
208% 5.67 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 50%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 128GB
94GB free, PID 0747
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 79 80 83 82 82 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
43.2% Average
Read 84.7
Write 79.9
Mixed 66.8
SusWrite 80.8
106% 78.1 MB/s
4K Read 9.5
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 4.7
318% 5.93 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BD160B.C16 1315 CT102464BD160B.C16 0420 MI64C1D1629Z1 0420 MI64C1D1629Z1 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.6% Above average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 15.4
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 18.5
SC Mixed 14.1
46% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 78.7
51% 78.7 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 27.2" 1280 720 GSM7706 LG HDR 4K
Typical M51AC Builds (Compare 663 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Asus M51AC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $214
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback