Asus M51AC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus M51AC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M51AC
Memory28 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130625
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMay 30 '22 at 05:01
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$75
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
78% Very good
Memory 90.8
1-Core 109
2-Core 204
78% 135 Pts
4-Core 352
8-Core 552
56% 452 Pts
64-Core 566
35% 566 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 78%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
MSI(1462 3366) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 496.13
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
103% Outstanding
Lighting 129
Reflection 142
Parallax 132
105% 134 fps
MRender 116
Gravity 133
Splatting 117
100% 122 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 103%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$113
106GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 361 360 356 357 354 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 447
Write 431
Mixed 345
SusWrite 335
88% 390 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 98
4K Mixed 46.9
163% 59.5 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 347
264% 358 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 105%
Great: 124%
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$165
1.5TB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 414 457 451 458 458 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 464
Write 398
Mixed 396
SusWrite 413
94% 418 MB/s
4K Read 38.8
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 53.5
186% 67.7 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 360
271% 363 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 118%
Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
526GB free
Firmware: CC24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 129 131 131 131 131 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Read 119
Write 91.7
Mixed 73.4
SusWrite 129
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BD160B.C16 1315 CT102464BD160B.C16 0420 MI64C1D1629Z1 0420 MI64C1D1629Z1 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
58.8% Above average
MC Read 22
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 16.8
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 21.4
SC Mixed 20.2
55% 19.2 GB/s
Latency 66.1
60% 66.1 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M51AC Builds (Compare 640 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Asus M51AC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $206
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback