bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Memory28GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 28GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory25.6 GB free of 28 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201027
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 28 '21 at 02:50
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2673 v4
None, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Memory 63.8
1-Core 82.5
2-Core 163
58% 103 Pts
4-Core 320
8-Core 305
42% 313 Pts
64-Core 324
20% 324 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 64%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Virtual Disk 60GB
51GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 134 162 117 132 152 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
38.8% Below average
Read 372
Write 386
Mixed 374
SusWrite 145
72% 319 MB/s
4K Read 11.3
4K Write 12
4K Mixed 12.1
39% 11.8 MB/s
DQ Read 64.9
DQ Write 64.9
DQ Mixed 64.1
48% 64.6 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 59%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 136GB
99GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 111 125 99 108 122 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Microsoft Corporation None Corporation None 28GB
0, 0 MHz
1024, 27648 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 37.8
MC Write 44.7
MC Mixed 42.6
119% 41.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 13.2
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 102%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 5: 1R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
5% 12% 8 7 5 32 0" 1366 768
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,554 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $60
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback