bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive59.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory28GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 28GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory24.8 GB free of 28 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220510
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 27 '22 at 21:43
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Platinum 8272CL
None, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
61.5% Good
Memory 57.6
1-Core 91.4
2-Core 191
62% 113 Pts
4-Core 377
8-Core 378
50% 377 Pts
64-Core 364
22% 364 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 70%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Virtual Disk 136GB
107GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 164 164 160 164 164 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Read 402
Write 185
Mixed 251
SusWrite 164
56% 251 MB/s
4K Read 49.9
4K Write 13.8
4K Mixed 19.5
108% 27.7 MB/s
DQ Read 66
DQ Write 13.3
DQ Mixed 23.2
21% 34.2 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 77%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 60GB
51GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 230 229 234 230 230 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 395
Write 442
Mixed 445
SusWrite 231
85% 378 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 34.9
4K Mixed 25.2
84% 27.2 MB/s
DQ Read 65
DQ Write 65.5
DQ Mixed 65.6
49% 65.4 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Microsoft Corporation None Corporation None 28GB
0, 0 MHz
1024, 27648 MB
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
53.7% Above average
MC Read 18
MC Write 26.1
MC Mixed 20.6
62% 21.6 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 5.6
17% 6.07 GB/s
Latency 135
30% 135 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,554 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $60
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback