Asus P8Z77-V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics55% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-V  (all builds)
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121219
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateOct 06 '21 at 08:01
Run Duration224 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Memory 93.5
1-Core 102
2-Core 205
78% 134 Pts
4-Core 340
8-Core 522
53% 431 Pts
64-Core 521
32% 521 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55% Above average
Lighting 68.1
Reflection 71.5
Parallax 66.4
56% 68.7 fps
MRender 66.4
Gravity 67.9
Splatting 64.6
54% 66.3 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra Plus 256GB-$139
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X211200
SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 229 259 291 252 282 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
69.5% Good
Read 343
Write 271
Mixed 152
SusWrite 259
57% 256 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 64.7
4K Mixed 24.2
102% 37.8 MB/s
DQ Read 230
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 106
106% 170 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 99%
Crucial M4 256GB-$218
90GB free
Firmware: 040H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 211 234 207 194 195 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 442
Write 251
Mixed 264
SusWrite 207
65% 291 MB/s
4K Read 18.6
4K Write 83.6
4K Mixed 14.2
91% 38.8 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 112
DQ Mixed 23.8
43% 85.1 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 74%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
1TB free
Firmware: CC24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 173 175 176 175 175 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
Read 155
Write 138
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 174
99% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 114%
Seagate Expansion 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0710
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 28 29 29 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Read 28.4
Write 26.4
Mixed 27.5
SusWrite 27.8
20% 27.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 0.5
153% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 66%
WD My Book 1230 3TB
982GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 26 27 27 28 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Read 31.7
Write 27.3
Mixed 25.8
SusWrite 26.7
37% 27.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
112% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 44%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 1TB
931GB free, PID 61f5
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 255 265 302 312 320 320 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
195% Outstanding
Read 321
Write 298
Mixed 291
SusWrite 296
409% 301 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 25.7
4K Mixed 23.8
1,767% 24 MB/s
DQ Read 25
DQ Write 26.4
DQ Mixed 27.9
1,940% 26.4 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 195%
Great: 411%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 2133 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
58.2% Above average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 18
57% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 18.8
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 61.1
66% 61.1 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 31.5" 1280 720 SAM0F94 U32R59x
Typical P8Z77-V Builds (Compare 2,153 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $391
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback