Gigabyte GA-H77-DS3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive45.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H77-DS3H  (all builds)
Memory2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130731
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 16 '21 at 04:37
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3470 CPU @ 3.20GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Memory 82.2
1-Core 86.4
2-Core 189
68% 119 Pts
4-Core 371
8-Core 370
50% 370 Pts
64-Core 365
23% 365 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Gigabyte(1458 3642) 2GB
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 466.63
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Lighting 17.8
Reflection 17.1
Parallax 16.8
14% 17.2 fps
MRender 22.5
Gravity 18.7
Splatting 15.2
15% 18.8 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Orico M200 256GB
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0901A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 32 65 29 66 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
45.6% Average
Read 449
Write 116
Mixed 81.6
SusWrite 53.6
38% 175 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 35.9
4K Mixed 13.6
63% 22.4 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 125
DQ Mixed 14.1
40% 86.1 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 96%
Kingston SA400S37/240GB 240GB
170GB free
Firmware: S1127B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 362 380 347 369 371 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
79.7% Very good
Read 476
Write 398
Mixed 377
SusWrite 358
90% 402 MB/s
4K Read 16.5
4K Write 75.2
4K Mixed 22.4
94% 38 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 35.1
83% 168 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 88%
Kingston SA400S37 240GB
187GB free
Firmware: S0211A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 6.6 45 6.6 29 18 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
21.6% Poor
Read 227
Write 228
Mixed 9.9
SusWrite 45.3
28% 127 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 6.6
4K Mixed 0.4
37% 9.5 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 86%
BULLDOZER-128GB 128GB
76GB free
Firmware: T0910A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 209 221 207 220 218 MB/s
Performing below potential (54th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
49% Average
Read 242
Write 221
Mixed 222
SusWrite 211
50% 224 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 44
4K Mixed 11.6
70% 25.6 MB/s
DQ Read 83.8
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 26.1
52% 100 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 49%
Great: 66%
Seagate ST1000VM002-1CT162 1TB
716GB free
Firmware: SC23
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 128 157 150 154 134 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Read 126
Write 127
Mixed 66.4
SusWrite 140
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HYPERZ1600D3N11/8G 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
32% Below average
MC Read 11.1
MC Write 11
MC Mixed 9.4
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 8.9
27% 9.3 GB/s
Latency 76.6
52% 76.6 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 32%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H77-DS3H Builds (Compare 1,010 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H77-DS3H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $384
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback