Topsee P9X79-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics25.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemTopsee P9X79-PLUS  (all builds)
MotherboardTOPSEE P9X79-PLUS
Memory23.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170309
Uptime3.3 Days
Run DateOct 19 '21 at 12:20
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel @ 2.90GHz
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Memory 69.8
1-Core 76.7
2-Core 153
58% 99.7 Pts
4-Core 258
8-Core 504
45% 381 Pts
64-Core 746
46% 746 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$82
Nvidia(10DE 11C0) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.7% Poor
Lighting 32.2
Reflection 33.8
Parallax 32.1
26% 32.7 fps
MRender 36.9
Gravity 33.2
Splatting 23.1
25% 31.1 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 25.7%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$84
247GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR032
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 210 238 238 237 238 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
58% Above average
Read 253
Write 237
Mixed 233
SusWrite 224
53% 237 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 35.3
4K Mixed 29.3
91% 29.2 MB/s
DQ Read 50.6
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 84.1
76% 111 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 58%
Great: 125%
SMI 2258 SSD 480GB
117GB free
Firmware: Q0526A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 216 235 235 234 235 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
57.8% Above average
Read 254
Write 240
Mixed 236
SusWrite 224
54% 239 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 40.2
4K Mixed 29.9
95% 31.2 MB/s
DQ Read 105
DQ Write 77.6
DQ Mixed 84.3
65% 88.9 MB/s
Poor: 98%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 115%
SMI 2258 SSD 480GB
248GB free
Firmware: Q0526A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 335 387 426 426 423 424 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Read 476
Write 443
Mixed 416
SusWrite 404
98% 435 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 61.7
4K Mixed 38.5
124% 42.7 MB/s
DQ Read 29.6
DQ Write 74.5
DQ Mixed 119
72% 74.4 MB/s
Poor: 98%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 115%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown NVD2G7T3510FC 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.2% Poor
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 9.7
MC Mixed 8.8
28% 9.7 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 8.4
27% 9.3 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P9X79-PLUS Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Topsee P9X79-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $82
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback