Topsee P9X79-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics63.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive70.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemTopsee P9X79-PLUS  (all builds)
MotherboardTOPSEE P9X79-PLUS
Memory19.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170309
Uptime2.6 Days
Run DateJan 03 '23 at 13:15
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel @ 2.90GHz
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
66.3% Good
Memory 74.7
1-Core 82
2-Core 162
62% 106 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 521
51% 416 Pts
64-Core 817
51% 817 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
MSI(1462 C757) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3312 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
63.7% Good
Lighting 77.2
Reflection 85.7
Parallax 75
63% 79.3 fps
MRender 104
Gravity 72.1
Splatting 69.5
65% 81.7 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$84
187GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR032
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 215 241 243 243 246 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
70.1% Very good
Read 256
Write 248
Mixed 231
SusWrite 229
54% 241 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 50.2
4K Mixed 37.7
117% 38.6 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 181
142% 195 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 125%
SMI 2258 SSD 480GB
142GB free
Firmware: Q0526A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 345 377 435 433 431 439 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
97.6% Outstanding
Read 484
Write 453
Mixed 417
SusWrite 410
99% 441 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 59.9
4K Mixed 39.1
125% 42.6 MB/s
DQ Read 336
DQ Write 289
DQ Mixed 122
143% 249 MB/s
Poor: 98%
This bench: 97.6%
Great: 115%
SMI 2258 SSD 480GB
415GB free
Firmware: Q0526A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 217 242 240 240 244 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
73.5% Very good
Read 250
Write 246
Mixed 237
SusWrite 229
54% 241 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 52.2
4K Mixed 40.8
129% 41.8 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 133
118% 178 MB/s
Poor: 98%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 115%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown NVD2G7T3510FC 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.7% Poor
MC Read 10.4
MC Write 9.9
MC Mixed 9
28% 9.77 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 10.9
SC Mixed 7.9
26% 9.27 GB/s
Latency 91
44% 91 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P9X79-PLUS Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Topsee P9X79-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $82
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback