Today's hottest deals

Asrock A320M-DVS R4.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics76.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-DVS R4.0  (all builds)
Memory6.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200716
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateOct 23 '21 at 14:43
Run Duration212 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500X-$160
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Memory 77.1
1-Core 142
2-Core 284
90% 168 Pts
4-Core 551
8-Core 802
84% 676 Pts
64-Core 705
44% 705 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$225
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 496.13
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Lighting 96.6
Reflection 94
Parallax 86.8
79% 92.5 fps
MRender 113
Gravity 82.7
Splatting 75.6
72% 90.4 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 480GB-$35
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR041
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 490
Write 436
Mixed 400
99% 442 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 96.1
4K Mixed 23.7
128% 50.2 MB/s
DQ Read 28.8
DQ Write 116
DQ Mixed 25.7
33% 56.9 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 92%
WD Game Drive 2TB
850GB free, PID 2630
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 36 36 36 36 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
26.4% Poor
Read 38.4
Write 34.3
Mixed 27.8
SusWrite 36
46% 34.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.3
155% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4DFD8266.C16FP 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
52.8% Above average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 18.1
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 18.4
51% 18 GB/s
Latency 86.2
46% 86.2 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-DVS R4.0 Builds (Compare 785 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-DVS R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $317
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback