Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-16R4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics35% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive92.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star GF63 Thin 10SCXR
MotherboardMSI MS-16R4  (all builds)
Memory15.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201225
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateNov 14 '21 at 13:33
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User ARE-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
63.3% Good
Memory 82.8
1-Core 107
2-Core 175
72% 122 Pts
4-Core 238
8-Core 385
38% 312 Pts
64-Core 537
33% 537 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650 with Max-Q Design
MSI(1462 12BD) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7111
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
35% Below average
Lighting 42.6
Reflection 49.2
Parallax 41.7
35% 44.5 fps
MRender 53
Gravity 40.4
Splatting 39.5
36% 44.3 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 35%
Great: 40%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ5 512GB
268GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK12.D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 451 382 552 329 372 414 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Read 580
Write 582
Mixed 511
SusWrite 416
118% 522 MB/s
4K Read 11.2
4K Write 46.1
4K Mixed 28.4
78% 28.6 MB/s
DQ Read 543
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 412
313% 427 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 149%
Kingston A400 480GB-$35
156GB free
Firmware: S3501103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.2 31 38 9.3 40 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
17.8% Very poor
Read 338
Write 127
Mixed 159
SusWrite 25.5
36% 162 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
10% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5663-007.A00G 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65.4% Good
MC Read 24.6
MC Write 23.2
MC Mixed 20.6
65% 22.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 27.2
SC Mixed 21.1
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 75.5
53% 75.5 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16R4 Builds (Compare 3,084 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16R4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback