HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1495
Memory8.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111110
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 04 '21 at 07:29
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
70.3% Very good
Memory 81.3
1-Core 91.2
2-Core 180
68% 118 Pts
4-Core 346
8-Core 330
46% 338 Pts
64-Core 330
20% 330 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
Zotac(19DA 6222) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 266 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.61% Terrible
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 0.7
2% 1.33 fps
MRender 2.2
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 1.9
2% 2.13 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.61%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$69
837GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ST6OA31B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 84 86 90 90 94 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 108
Write 110
Mixed 53.2
SusWrite 85.4
65% 89.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 61%
Seagate ST32000542AS 2TB-$100
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 104 105 105 106 106 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 100
Write 100
Mixed 59.5
SusWrite 105
67% 91.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB Nanya NT4GC64B8HG0NF-DI Micron 16JTF25664AZ-1G4F1 RMR1870ED48E8F1333 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.2% Below average
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 10.8
MC Mixed 10.8
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 10.3
SC Mixed 11.5
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 78.1
51% 78.1 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC Builds (Compare 3,284 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $278
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback